Team Chat Logs

March 1, 2010

2010 2
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
<< <   > >>

[00:57:43.471913]<bionoid>I use http auth from ldap, but there is an issue with case sensitivity. If users log in with 'Username' and 'username', both are accepted for login, but treated as different users by Trac.
[00:57:45.956080]<bionoid>Any way around that?
[00:58:05.166215]<bionoid>Like, force lowercase usernames ?
[01:19:30.107631]<osimons>bionoid: a trac.ini setting exists
[01:20:21.662893]<osimons>[trac] ignore_auth_case = true
[01:20:48.140930]<osimons>(will lower-case all auth names)
[01:34:28.196096]<bionoid>osimons: Ahh, thank you!
[01:35:34.359054]<bionoid>osimons: Also, what is the "correct" procedure to nuke the incorrect users? Just delete from session table?
[01:36:35.598941]<osimons>no "correct" way, i suppose. nuking non-lower case seems the natural option seeing they will never be used again with option enabled
[01:37:09.417584]<osimons>sessions will expire in time, but the auth_cookie won't i think
[01:39:03.977301]<bionoid>Aha, ok I will backup the database and give it a go ;-)
[01:39:55.099829]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9315]: Functional tests could fail arbitrarily as some `random_sentence`s could ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9315>
[01:46:26.418265]<bionoid>osimons: I submit unofficial proposal to enable this option by default -- does anyone really distinguish users by different case?
[01:46:42.576074]<bionoid>In any case, works perfectly now and the mess is cleaned up. Thanks :-)
[02:09:25.537112]<otaku42>moin
[02:09:55.415618]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9317]: css: for the revisionlog, remove unneeded padding in ''Age'' cells - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9317> || Changeset [9316]: versioncontrol/cache: PostgreSQL returned the changeset entries in a ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9316>
[02:40:11.969849]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9318]: changeset template: work around a Genshi i18n filter bug ( within ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9318>
[06:10:50.266531]<[greg]>hi there
[06:23:51.326482]<doki_pen>otaku42: ping
[06:24:17.541276]<doki_pen>otaku42: if you get a chance, give me ownership of the AnnouncerPlugin on trac-hacks.org. Tickets still go to the previous maintainer by default
[06:26:36.847804]<otaku42>doki_pen: that's doki_pen, too?
[06:27:21.330456]<otaku42>seems so
[06:27:34.133833]<otaku42>doki_pen: done.
[06:30:17.783037]<doki_pen>otaku42: ty
[06:31:45.496409]<otaku42>doki_pen: yw
[06:59:37.516860]<doobs>Hi all
[07:00:07.294015]<doobs>May someone can help me with python2.5->2.6 upgrade and trac issue ?
[07:00:20.045316]<misc>ie ?
[07:00:33.798701]<doobs>I've upgraded my debian server to python2.6
[07:00:55.758379]<doobs>I'm running apache+trac wsgi
[07:01:31.678464]<doobs>build again my trac engin (I can see the correct eggs in 2.6)
[07:02:13.184636]<doobs>but I still have a trac instance with python2.5 (when looking at /about page)
[07:02:28.014490]<doobs>I cannot launch my plugins-2.6 eggs
[07:02:33.581743]<doobs>any idea how to solve it ?
[07:03:47.264604]<misc>nothing in log ?
[07:05:12.369256]<doobs>arff, just asked the question and then I think what's wrong...
[07:05:43.842906]<misc>that happen a lot
[07:05:46.926021]<doobs>Trac seems to be in 2.6, but my plugin cannot load as I do not have upgraded all 2.6 related tools
[07:06:43.705503]<doobs>But (minor issue) : in logs, I see trac running with python 2.6, and in /about page, it's still in 2.5
[08:39:59.832658]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9099 (AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name') created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9099>
[08:41:43.496295]*retracile whines something defamatory about mornings.
[08:56:19.019221]<Marquel>morning.
[08:58:41.940824]<Marquel>i have a strange observation: a trac-environment does, after upgrading python from 2.5 to 2.6, no longer work in /ticket and /browser (everything else works as before). that very same environment (without the subversion-repository) works quite as well on another machine with a similar trac-setup. i suspect python, but i don't have a single clue what might be wrong. apache does not report errors, it does also not send any html to the browser. trac-
[08:58:43.334378]<Marquel>debug-log does also not show any errors. where can i look?
[09:10:00.577815]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9100 (Please add a possibility to close ticket from outside web interface.) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9100> || Ticket #9099 (AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name') closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9099#comment:1>
[09:40:01.732231]<gozerbot>trac: 0.12/TracRepositoryAdmin edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/0.12/TracRepositoryAdmin?version=11> || Ticket #9100 (Please add a possibility to close ticket from outside web interface.) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9100#comment:1>
[10:21:52.958023]<retracile>Marquel: you might check that your subversion-python bindings are installed for 2.6 and not just 2.5
[10:22:16.228611]<retracile>Marquel: also check the install of mod_python or mod_wsgi or whatever you're using with apache.
[10:40:20.506782]<Marquel>retracile: subversion-python-bindings are installed for 2.6, as is mod_python.
[10:40:57.958782]<Marquel>retracile: the only sites not working are /ticket and /browser, all other trac-parts (wiki, roadmap, admin, new ticket) are working well.
[11:13:57.922332]<retracile>Marquel: What's the exact Trac version?
[11:55:17.149736]<Marquel>retracile: 0.11.6
[12:10:03.477456]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9321]: l10n/he: remove spurious change committed by mistake in r9320. - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9321> || Changeset [9320]: l10n/fr: minor changes to the French translation - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9320> || Changeset [9319]: Reformat the SQL queries in the ticket subsystem to use multi-line strings ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9319>
[12:16:45.999727]<Marquel>bfb
[12:29:37.205410]<Marquel>re
[14:11:21.052311]<rblank>retracile: Nice cube designs!
[14:44:16.448311]<retracile>rblank: hey! Made it home safely, I presume. :)
[14:44:49.799186]<rblank>retracile: Yes, return trip was better (shorter + individual in-flight entertainment system). How about you?
[14:45:47.493624]<retracile>rblank: uneventful, about the same number of hours as the trip there due to an extra errand.
[14:46:01.949848]<rblank>LEGOs again?
[14:46:14.565397]<retracile>rblank: No, a rose for my wife. :)
[14:46:19.436959]<hylje>a lego rose
[14:46:19.993756]<rblank>Ooh, nice!
[14:46:39.734742]<retracile>hylje: Heh, might have to try that one day. :)
[14:48:42.052719]<retracile>rblank: While I was getting my truck inspected today, I created a patch for the functional tests to make the twill submit() method a bit less cumbersome.
[14:49:01.996884]<retracile>rblank: Hopefully I can make some time tonight to commit that.
[14:49:13.165711]<rblank>retracile: Good stuff!
[14:49:31.861194]<rblank>I'm currently testing 0.11.7rc1. Looks good, probably ok to release this week.
[14:50:01.114132]<retracile>rblank: good to hear :)
[14:50:20.889832]<retracile>rblank: also, any chance to get a review of my patch for #8235?
[14:50:41.866318]<rblank>retracile: Not yet. But it's not forgotten.
[14:50:58.332599]<retracile>rblank: "not forgotten" is good enough for me. :)
[14:51:10.489188]<rblank>Actually, I had to take a little break from coding. Last week got me a bit saturated :)
[14:51:18.607599]<retracile>ha! :)
[14:51:45.120399]<rblank>13-16 hours of coding every day for a whole week, that's a bit too much for me.
[14:51:49.487933]<retracile>Had more of the opposite effect on me, at least so far. :)
[14:52:00.848268]<rblank>Excellent!
[14:52:10.098693]<retracile>hehe :)
[14:52:52.327246]<rblank>retracile: Don't forget the cube at hand, when running the tests :)
[14:53:13.097088]<retracile>It _is_ a bit painful to dive back into this Java though :/
[14:53:32.566810]<rblank>Java is too verbose
[14:53:50.007862]<retracile>rblank: heh. Yeah, I need to hunt down mine. They sat on a shelf unloved for years, so I finally cleared the "clutter", and now I want them back again. :)
[14:54:30.393947]<retracile>rblank: Yeah, and compounding that is that this is low-quality Java code.
[14:54:41.118112]*cmc mumbles: scala's nice
[14:55:21.306651]<rblank>retracile: You should take it apart, clean it, put it back together, then spray some silicon spray inside. Makes wonders!
[14:55:31.873543]<rblank>(The cube, I mean, not the Java code :)
[14:55:56.896675]<rblank>cmc: Haven't had a chance to use it, but I've heard the same.
[14:57:12.316886]<retracile>rblank: I'll have to try that. Have to physically _find_ it first.
[14:57:30.980359]<retracile>s/it/them/
[14:57:30.989589]<evil_twin>retracile meant: rblank: I'll have to try that. Have to physically _find_ them first.
[14:58:16.357344]<rblank>retracile: Let me know if you don't find them, I have a few to spare (3x3x3).
[14:58:50.638853]<retracile>rblank: heh :) I'll keep that in mind, though I have to wonder about cost-to-buy vs cost-to-ship...
[14:59:05.619236]<rblank>retracile: Doesn't matter :)
[14:59:22.387692]<retracile>heh :)
[14:59:58.645569]<retracile>rblank: yeah, you could just hand-deliver one at PyCon 2011 ;P
[15:00:10.109963]<rblank>retracile: Yeah, right :)
[15:00:21.542054]<retracile>:D
[15:00:51.813178]<rblank>retracile: I could have given you the one I had at PyCon 2010, but it was my best cube, so I was a bit too attached to it :)
[15:01:14.836849]<retracile>rblank: As well you should be... it was a very nice one.
[15:02:24.933289]<retracile>rblank: But alas, you have ruined me... I shall always look askance at "stock" cubes from now on. :)
[15:02:57.971216]<rblank>retracile: Sounds like the start of a speedcubing career!
[15:03:33.354917]<retracile>rblank: and the end of productivity :P
[15:04:05.080038]<rblank>retracile: The trick is to train when you have nothing else to do. I'm cubing while I walk to the office.
[15:04:25.255418]<retracile>rblank: Ah, very nice. :)
[15:05:13.516317]<rblank>retracile: Of course, *some* people code for Trac when they have nothing else to do. Go figure :)
[15:05:36.942811]<retracile>ha! :)
[15:10:08.830754]<gozerbot>trac: TracDev/ReleaseTesting edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseTesting?version=45>