Team Chat Logs

February 24, 2010

2010 1
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
<< <   > >>

[00:16:34.212531]<otaku42>moin
[03:39:07.574284]<gozerbot>trac: TracDev/ReleaseTesting edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseTesting?version=42>
[03:39:37.444663]<cboos>restarting t.e.o - please don't access it until further notice
[03:40:19.846466]<cboos>done
[03:46:29.248395]<macmaN>go cboos!
[04:39:08.828368]<gozerbot>trac: ChangeLog edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/ChangeLog?version=60> || Ticket #9080 (AttributeError: Cannot find an implementation of the "IRequestHandler" ...) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9080#comment:1> || Ticket #9080 (AttributeError: Cannot find an implementation of the "IRequestHandler" ...) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9080>
[04:53:39.625134]<nucc1>i can install trac for a svn repository on a remote system, right?
[06:09:12.325773]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9081 (infinite recursion when conf directory is read-only) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9081>
[06:48:48.506586]<exarkun>Does the latest trac still support ClearSilver templates at all?
[06:59:25.410633]*retracile utters something contemptuous about mornings.
[07:18:22.524488]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9081 (infinite recursion when conf directory is read-only) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9081#comment:1> || Changeset [9263]: util: Avoid an infinite loop when using an `AtomicFile` in a read-only ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9263>
[07:18:31.887439]<Morbus>g'day. my timeline *always* shows "Changeset [current:]", set to the current timestamp.
[07:18:45.536332]<Morbus>this is annoying to any rss reader, cos it always treats that item as new (due to the timestamp)
[07:18:49.652212]<Morbus>any idea why that is?
[07:21:30.251628]<Morbus>nevermind. i got it.
[07:21:30.611180]<Morbus>https://bugs.launchpad.net/trac-bzr/+bug/116659
[07:33:26.857406]<httpete>anyone know workflows? I want to make a rule that is triggered when the resolution goes to "tovalidate".. any pointers?
[07:35:54.285718]<retracile>httpete: I think you need to give a broader view of what you're trying to accomplish
[07:36:38.967024]<httpete>thanks retracile
[07:36:47.382769]<httpete>so we added a new resolution "tovalidate"
[07:36:54.302347]<httpete>you know, it's fixed, you go make sure it works for you.
[07:37:19.090640]<httpete>so I installed the Advanced Workflow Plugin which enables set_owner_to_reporter,
[07:37:33.107467]<httpete>which I want to do automatically when the ticket's resolution is set to "tovalidate"
[07:39:31.771515]<retracile>httpete: what do you want to happen after that?
[07:39:42.123984]<httpete>daz it really!
[07:39:49.998804]<httpete>just dev marks to validate,
[07:39:54.292689]<httpete>goes back to reporter.
[07:39:57.624205]<httpete>so he can close it.
[07:40:03.978051]<retracile>Well, is the original owner supposed to validate the ticket and close it?
[07:40:08.182451]<httpete>#resolve_tovalidate = accepted -> tovalidate
[07:40:09.046066]<httpete>#resolve_tovalidate.operations = set_owner_to_reporter
[07:40:16.024210]<httpete>something like that
[07:40:21.928655]<httpete>correct
[07:40:26.549500]<httpete>that is the workflow we want
[07:40:32.445879]<httpete>in the case of resolution "tovalidate"
[07:40:36.947014]<retracile>Ok, then "tovalidate" should not be a resolution, but it should be a state in the workflow.
[07:40:49.930076]<httpete>this is the nub of what I need to grasp.
[07:40:51.938041]<retracile>Then have a "validated" as a resolution if you want.
[07:42:13.030023]<httpete>how do I add a state retracile?
[07:42:22.704709]<httpete>(thank you in advance for the smack around)
[07:42:24.184913]<retracile>So when the developer is done with the ticket, they click 'submit for validation' (or however you want to word it), the operations for that ticket include set_owner_to_reporter, and set the state to 'tovalidate'
[07:42:24.289584]<httpete>;-P
[07:42:49.533023]<httpete>hmm but to me it is just "closed" not validated...
[07:43:29.825763]<retracile>The workflow is highly configurable between 'new' and 'closed', but you need to keep 'new' and 'closed' as the endpoints of the workflow.
[07:43:56.937242]<retracile>So in_work -> to_validate -> closed
[07:44:08.602111]<httpete>yes that is it.
[07:44:20.413853]<httpete>I just want the reporter to be responsible for saying "ya its fixed" closed.
[07:45:37.709197]<httpete>and the developer to have an easy way to shoot it back to the reporeter
[07:46:13.831104]<retracile>httpete: ok, pastebin your current workflow so I have something to start with, and I'll try to explain how to add that.
[07:46:22.281575]<httpete>retracile thank you very much
[07:47:21.971967]<httpete>http://pastebin.com/YqJ7uFHi
[07:48:21.206829]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9266]: 0.12dev: merge [9265] from 0.11-stable - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9266> || Changeset [9265]: 0.11.7dev: add hint for del_resolution action - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9265> || Changeset [9264]: 0.12dev: cleanup the sqlite version checking to use tuples - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9264>
[07:52:20.136662]<retracile>httpete: paste modified to have a 'workdone' action and a 'to_validate' state. Is that close to what you're after?
[07:53:21.818445]<httpete>sounds right yes
[07:53:29.359712]<httpete>you modified the pastebin post?
[07:54:04.035011]<retracile>httpete: hm, perhaps it creates a new one based on the old one; here: http://pastebin.com/93D7bzfv
[07:55:49.933367]<httpete>testing
[08:02:37.437070]<httpete>retracile thank you, going to play wiith it a bit.
[08:02:42.995737]<httpete>I sincerely appreciate it.
[08:02:59.853468]<retracile>httpete: glad that got you going in the right direction
[08:15:24.078673]<pacopablo>can I now send something to this channel?
[08:15:26.869426]<pacopablo>woowoo!
[08:16:47.561978]<pacopablo>rapha: ping
[08:18:27.033135]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9267]: Fix for #9074. Encode project url in UTF-8 so that it can correctly be ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9267>
[08:20:08.773467]<kirean>retracile: I tried the hint fix and it works fine
[08:20:36.667707]<kirean>retracile: but I can't make a comment in any ticket since there are none for this fix
[08:20:52.464389]<kirean>(http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9265)
[08:24:20.206162]<retracile>kirean: what's your comment?
[08:32:43.444028]<kirean>retracile: it works. thanks! ;-)
[08:46:50.473196]<retracile>heh :)
[08:48:21.597291]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9074 (Notification system shows warning/error when the project domain contains ...) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9074#comment:4> || Ticket #9082 (Error sending email when smtp_default_domain and/or smtp_from contain ...) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9082>
[09:03:29.126249]<rapha>pacopablo: IRC is running through screen ... can be a couple of hours before I see something, sorry
[09:03:47.742496]<pacopablo>np
[09:48:22.072837]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9083 (AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name') created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9083>
[10:18:23.052052]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9083 (AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name') closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9083#comment:1>
[10:32:37.203923]<Guite>Hi all
[10:32:59.156920]<Guite>I get a "zipimport.ZipImportError: bad local file header" message when trying to upgrade to Genshi/Trac dev versions with easy_install. Any pointers are appreciated.
[10:35:58.842428]<Guite>if I can/should provide any additional information, please let me know.
[11:17:49.138334]<lawnchair>im getting the following error:
[11:17:49.819862]<lawnchair>Error: Failed to load processor trachtml No macro or processor named 'trachtml' found
[11:17:53.340045]<lawnchair>any idea?
[11:17:58.236590]<lawnchair>i cant find much on the googles
[11:18:23.126259]<gozerbot>trac: TracDev/Proposals/DataModel edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/DataModel?version=7> || Changeset [9268]: 0.12dev: fix if/elif inconsistency in ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9268>
[11:36:49.675353]<pacopablo>rblank: can you try the following code on both 2.4 and 2.5?
[11:36:50.780229]<pacopablo>http://paste.lisp.org/display/95553
[11:37:06.344249]<pacopablo>it assumes that you have sendmail in /usr/sbin/sendmail
[11:37:22.009905]<pacopablo>I just want to know if it produces a traceback or not
[11:37:31.934795]<pacopablo>and if it does, then can you run it in 2.6?
[11:43:17.379767]<dmo>i'm trying to setup trac on an apache webserver with regular cgi.. i followed the instructions but i am getting an internal server error
[11:48:23.483417]<gozerbot>trac: GenericTrac edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/GenericTrac?version=14> || GenericTrac edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/GenericTrac?version=13> || TracDev/Proposals/DataModel edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/DataModel?version=8>
[12:08:46.710319]<ldlework>Hi, I have been using Trac for a few years now and suddenly all my trac instances throw the error: Trac detected an internal error:
[12:08:46.917852]<ldlework>OperationalError: unable to open database file
[12:09:01.593810]<ldlework>I haven't changed anything in terms of the trac configs
[12:09:06.477057]<ldlework>The sql db's are still there
[12:09:12.681848]<ldlework>I'm pretty worried.
[12:09:59.062788]<wildintellect>I think that happened to me, and it was a bugged fixed in a later release
[12:10:14.857258]<cmc>do you have any backups of the db to test on?
[12:10:21.711818]<ldlework>cmc, the db's are still there
[12:10:25.756087]<ldlework>where they have always been
[12:10:43.314065]<cmc>right, I'm saying do you have a backup that you could replace that with to see if the file is corrupted
[12:10:45.131332]<ldlework>the trac config still reads sqlite:db/trac.db
[12:10:51.557717]<ldlework>oh
[12:10:57.889079]<ldlework>Why would all the DB's get corrupted?
[12:11:04.332271]<ldlework>Every instance I have throws the same error
[12:11:22.442717]<cmc>ah you have multiple db files
[12:12:06.409932]<cmc>any python updates recently?
[12:12:08.711117]<wildintellect>all I did to fix was upgrade trac versions
[12:12:29.016879]<wildintellect>it can happen without any updates too
[12:12:49.317778]<ldlework>how do you easily upgrade the Trac version? That sounds like its going to break all the plugins.
[12:13:02.520756]<ldlework>I mean it sounds like it can't open the DB or find it
[12:13:11.229384]<ldlework>Not that it is corrupt, since it happened to all of them at once
[12:13:31.240622]<ldlework>I was messing around with apache yesterday adding it to new groups and such.
[12:13:54.423901]<ldlework>but apache is part of the trac group, and I didn't change anything having to do with my instance's files.
[12:15:07.530928]<wildintellect>well if you want to check the db open it directly
[12:15:59.898127]<wildintellect>you can also try running trac directly to see if it's apache causing the issue
[12:16:12.489323]<ldlework>sqlite trac.db reports "file is encrypted or is not a database
[12:16:12.718759]<ldlework>"
[12:16:24.281804]<wildintellect>sqlite3
[12:16:38.668758]<wildintellect>sqlite is version 2
[12:17:14.794072]<ldlework>The database seems to be filled
[12:20:35.373640]<ldlework>running it directly and hitting the homepage I get a blank page with : IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/farm/ldlework/VERSION'
[12:21:09.593464]<wildintellect>ldlework, look through these tickets to see if anything applies http://trac.edgewall.org/search?q=OperationalError%3A+unable+to+open+database+file&noquickjump=1&changeset=on&ticket=on
[12:21:11.190673]<ldlework>Which is odd, since that file DOES exist
[12:22:35.943950]<wildintellect>it could also be one of your plugins, you might try disabling them
[12:26:28.564721]<ldlework> [Errno 122] Disk quota exceeded: '/home/ldlework/.python-eggs/IniAdmin-0.2-py2.5.egg-tmp'
[12:26:39.327665]<ldlework>=)
[12:30:46.701774]<ldlework>booyeah
[12:30:49.946868]<ldlework>thanks guys!
[12:37:06.799164]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9056 (Refactor trac.mimeview.pygments.GenshiHtmlFormatter for clarity.) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9056#comment:3> || Changeset [9269]: Restructuring per #9056 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9269>
[13:04:15.372118]<pacopablo>\q
[13:04:22.291849]<pacopablo>oops :)
[13:38:22.279266]<gozerbot>trac: IrcChannel edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/IrcChannel?version=14> || IrcChannel edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/IrcChannel?version=13>
[13:39:19.172899]<The_Eccentric>http://pastebin.com/4ecqErTB having an issue bmotion works but a lot of the functions dont getting a premission denied on it , but made all the files excuteable but still same says i need to upload my whois but that is to anyone can shead some light???
[14:08:22.736968]<gozerbot>trac: IrcChannel edited - <http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/IrcChannel?version=15>
[15:38:24.692821]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9270]: ticket: Added a method `Ticket.delete_change()` to delete a ticket ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9270>
[16:08:24.944672]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #3641 (Add a way to revert ticket changes) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3641#comment:5>
[16:38:25.209902]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #8948 (TitleIndex and Specialchars) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8948#comment:3>
[17:38:25.560133]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9084 (replying to a ticket comment yields 'No ngettext function available') created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9084>
[17:50:49.703475]<Windopain>any ideas why i would have no users to select from in the 'assign to' combobox when creating a new ticket?
[18:08:26.199656]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9085 (Notification system silently drops failures to unicode email addresses) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9085> || Changeset [9271]: 0.12dev: Add testcase to reproduce error for #9084 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9271>
[18:38:27.361315]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9273]: Follow-up to [9272], removed a spurious line. - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9273> || Changeset [9272]: i18n: Fixed an `AssertionError` on the ticket page when Babel is not ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9272>
[19:08:27.112258]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9084 (replying to a ticket comment yields 'No ngettext function available') closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9084#comment:4> || Changeset [9274]: wiki: Close an open paragraph before opening a ``, as the ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9274>
[19:38:27.599083]<gozerbot>trac: Changeset [9275]: intertrac: Fixed redirection to links containing spaces. Closes #4865. - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/9275>
[19:38:51.544037]<pacopablo>doki_pen: ping
[21:53:56.587203]<justinlilly>hello?
[21:53:59.844827]<justinlilly>hi?
[21:54:21.233484]<evil_sibling>hell
[21:54:23.893184]<evil_sibling>o
[23:38:31.079598]<gozerbot>trac: Ticket #9086 (to view ticket comments as well, in timeline) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9086>