Team Chat Logs

September 5, 2010

2010 8
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
<< <   > >>

[01:13:26.346762]<macmaN>which backend
[01:41:01.162853]<Tobias|>Backend? 'git', if I interpret your question correclty
[08:00:04.677520]<gbot83>t.e.o: add_required_fields_inclde_new_ticket.patch attached to Ticket #2463 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/2463/add_required_fields_inclde_new_ticket.patch> - Mark Mc Mahon <mark.mcmahon@…>
[08:40:09.706808]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #2463 (Mandatory fields in tickets) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/2463#comment:12> - Mark Mc Mahon <mark.mcmahon@…>
[12:38:33.244674]<macmaN>/ep/admin/pluginmanager i think is the URL
[12:38:42.812167]<macmaN>blah
[12:38:45.813960]<macmaN>ww
[13:30:57.258422]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10050]: 0.12.1dev: Fixed the wrapping of field changes in ticket notifications. ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10050> - rblank
[13:31:02.258275]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9484 ([PATCH] textarea formatting problems in TracNotification) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9484#comment:8> - rblank
[13:31:07.257868]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9484 ([PATCH] textarea formatting problems in TracNotification) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9484#comment:9> - rblank
[13:35:58.233593]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9484 ([PATCH] textarea formatting problems in TracNotification) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9484#comment:9> - rblank
[13:47:56.576840]<rblank>hasienda: Touchy, eh? :)
[13:49:02.003251]<hasienda>rblank: hello, (erm? looking for "Touchy")
[13:49:48.771448]<rblank>hasienda: Gereitzt? :)
[13:49:50.207376]<hasienda>rblank: not forgotten custom time fields, but I was just out for some i18n work on ScreenshotsPlugin and TagsPlugin
[13:50:24.255795]<hasienda>rblank: Ah, well; guess you reference my comments to Genshi ticket #400?
[13:50:42.273372]<rblank>hasienda: No worries. I'm actually quite advanced with the review, and should be able to commit later this week.
[13:50:47.537002]<rblank>Yes, #400 it is.
[13:52:10.148317]<hasienda>rblank: indeed, the whole store is not too nice, at least from my point of view, having lost a significant share of my working time, that I expected to bring in for more i18n on other plugins
[13:53:14.497000]<rblank>hasienda: Shit happens, as they say...
[13:53:21.456245]<hasienda>rblank: Well, nice to hear about your review. Mind me asking a design question that came up recently for me?
[13:53:41.077455]<rblank>hasienda: Sure.
[13:54:17.371753]<hasienda>rblank: I've seen some (proposed) changes to the trac.util.datefmt modules recently.
[13:54:39.222191]<rblank>hasienda: Which ones would that be?
[13:55:04.077006]<hasienda>rblank: not exactly related to that, but I just started to wonder, if in general it would be preferred to not touch that code,
[13:55:22.087670]<hasienda>rblank: as I do in my current patches, but
[13:55:54.567359]<rblank>hasienda: Well, that's one of the things I didn't quite like in your patch, indeed. I moved the default_now argument out of datefmt and into the caller, where required.
[13:56:45.024191]<hasienda>rblank: to handle the "empty time field" situation more internally and just - you take the word before I can type
[13:57:13.149301]<rblank>hasienda: So yes, I think we agree on that one.
[13:57:57.589773]<hasienda>rblank: remember to re-set the empty to really empty as required. Yes, I've learned that by now.
[13:58:49.203547]<rblank>hasienda: Not sure what you mean there...
[13:59:07.978803]<hasienda>rblank: Guess I wait for your bundled response to go on with further improving patches on my own, right?
[14:00:25.215785]<rblank>hasienda: You can already see the first step on BB, if you want. But Christian already noticed that viewing diffs on BB is not *that* nice, so I may set up a clone of my work repository on t.e.o.
[14:01:02.882473]<hasienda>rblank: I meant, the "empty" property should be preserved by the (new) code on it's own and any automatic addition reset as needed afterwards, i.e. right before displaying, etc.
[14:02:05.595376]<hasienda>rblank: uh? I've personally not had any trouble with diffs at BB, maybe should have a closer look than ...
[14:02:12.409440]<rblank>hasienda: ok
[14:02:41.760834]<hasienda>rblank: ok, thanks for taking care. I really appreciate that.
[14:02:48.096670]<rblank>hasienda: The diffs are ok, but he seemed to say that it wasn't possible to view the diff between the heads of two branches.
[14:03:03.262453]<rblank>hasienda: And, of course, BB's diffs are not as nice as Trac's :)
[14:04:57.925492]<hasienda>rblank: ah well, their bad, why don't they just use (and extend repo stuff of) Trac for all that?
[14:06:04.046913]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10051]: 0.12.1dev: Fixed the formatting of the field table in ticket notifications ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10051> - rblank
[14:06:09.046104]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9494 ([PATCH] $ticket_props doesn't wrap long field values in notification ...) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9494#comment:4> - rblank
[14:06:14.045465]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9494 ([PATCH] $ticket_props doesn't wrap long field values in notification ...) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9494#comment:5> - rblank
[14:06:29.053357]<rblank>hasienda: No idea :)
[14:06:48.566749]<hasienda>rblank: guess, that could really make an extended (Mercurial) repository browser and related stuff, right?
[14:08:46.769217]<hasienda>rblank: as I say that, I really need to get a start with Mercurial binding to Trac to dive into the whole Trac VCS-related code :-)
[14:11:18.656384]<hasienda>rblank: anyway, I adopted some Trac plugins recently, and try to help with http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/Announcer, so try to get some more work done on that code tonight. See you soon.
[14:41:10.000013]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset in rblank [7073:32d969e79387]: First pass, major simplifications: * Always pass datetime objects into ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/32d969e793871a9ddc9b9f6fdcf17ad0ecf03b16/rblank> - rblank
[14:41:14.999211]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10052]: 0.12.1dev: enable a default language to be configured in TracIni. Setting ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10052> - cboos
[14:41:19.998882]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10053]: 0.12.1dev: trac-admin uses the default_language configured for the ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10053> - cboos
[14:41:24.998599]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #8117 (Default language setting in trac.ini) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8117#comment:14> - cboos
[14:46:10.965277]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10054]: 0.12.1dev: add missing sort indicators in table headings of report ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10054> - cboos
[14:46:15.963850]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10055]: 0.12.1dev: consolidate two rules for the same elements - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10055> - cboos
[14:51:11.931058]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9604 (New layout for the report list) created - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9604> - cboos
[14:51:16.931717]<gbot83>t.e.o: new_report_list.png attached to Ticket #9604 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/9604/new_report_list.png> - cboos
[14:56:12.911258]<gbot83>t.e.o: new_report_list-r10049.patch attached to Ticket #9604 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/9604/new_report_list-r10049.patch> - cboos
[14:56:17.910947]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9604 (New layout for the report list) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9604#comment:1> - cboos
[15:06:14.854108]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #1942 ([patch] Add support for date type in custom ticket fields) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/1942#comment:37> - rblank
[15:13:42.453964]<Dutchy_>heya
[15:13:54.891439]<Dutchy_>I am trying to rename one of the default fields
[15:14:07.767882]<Dutchy_>( for tickets)
[15:14:14.825641]<Dutchy_>for example version
[15:14:20.937859]<Dutchy_>is this possible?
[15:14:37.240479]<Dutchy_>i tried adding version.label but that did not work
[15:14:44.231117]<Dutchy_>in trac.ini, that is
[15:15:00.898523]<Dutchy_>0.11 btw
[15:16:16.808600]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9604 (New layout for the report list) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9604#comment:2> - rblank
[15:18:22.403709]<Dutchy_>the goal is to get a "Fixed in version" field instead of the normal version field
[15:19:20.250289]<Dutchy_>an extra field would be ok too, but i'm not sure how i would get all versions in a new dropdown
[15:21:17.773053]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #8426 (Unable to print any of the admin pages) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8426#comment:8> - rblank
[15:21:22.772575]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9566 (Improper handling of scoped repositories in svn AuthzSourcePolicy) closed - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9566#comment:9> - rblank
[15:21:27.773066]<gbot83>t.e.o: Changeset [10056]: 0.12.1dev: Formalize the notion of repository scope by defining a default, ... - <http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/10056> - rblank
[15:21:32.772005]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #7699 (TracQuery documentation on Query Language operators is incorrect) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/7699#comment:9> - rblank
[15:28:49.553995]<hasienda>Dutchy_: interesting idea. while I think I've not seen a way to do "re-labeling" by now, this might be possible with at least one of these plugins: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/BlackMagicTicketTweaksPlugin (advertised in wiki), http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DynamicFieldsPlugin (not yet, but very active author/maintainer)
[15:46:21.726770]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9571 (Could not create new "InitEnv") updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9571#comment:10> - rblank
[15:50:59.375185]<Dutchy_>hasienda: i'll have a look, thanks
[15:51:22.704773]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #8664 (Timeline calls today yesterday) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8664#comment:7> - rblank
[15:51:27.325892]<hasienda>Dutchy_: you're welcome, good luck.
[16:14:48.674805]<osimons>Dutchy_: no need for black magic here - add a custom field, and if you don't care for versions just remove all options in admin and the default field disappers from sight. http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracTicketsCustomFields
[16:15:25.257688]<osimons>custom fields take options like 1.0|1.1|1.2|1.3....
[16:16:39.734856]<osimons>Dutchy_: and, if you want to simplify your custom field management then just use my plugin: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/CustomFieldAdminPlugin
[16:31:25.465634]<Dutchy_>that would make adding versions less of a hassle
[16:31:53.265473]<Dutchy_>the point was that i do care about versions, i just dont manage them, im the only one with access to the trac.ini
[16:32:17.857258]<Dutchy_>but i've renamed it with black magic now, that works for our purposes
[19:31:55.460267]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9581 (Documentation page for TracIni should list or have reference to allowed ...) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9581#comment:6> - Ryan J Ollos <ryano@…>
[19:32:00.463494]<gbot83>t.e.o: t9581-r10056.patch attached to Ticket #9581 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/9581/t9581-r10056.patch> - Ryan J Ollos <ryano@…>
[19:36:55.944612]<gbot83>t.e.o: PrefsPanelText2.png attached to Ticket #9581 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/9581/PrefsPanelText2.png> - Ryan J Ollos <ryano@…>
[19:37:00.943883]<gbot83>t.e.o: PrefsPanelText1.png attached to Ticket #9581 - <http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/9581/PrefsPanelText1.png> - Ryan J Ollos <ryano@…>
[19:41:56.921204]<gbot83>t.e.o: Ticket #9581 (Documentation page for TracIni should list or have reference to allowed ...) updated - <http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9581#comment:7> - Ryan J Ollos <ryano@…>